Comments for Fundraiser To Benefit Mom, Son Injured In Fireworks Fire Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Anonymous on Jul 2, 2012 at 01:28 PM
People can make assumptions as they wish.
Posted by: jessica on Jul 2, 2012 at 04:36 AM
Our thoughts and prayers for mother and child for a complete recovery. Sorry to hear about another firework related injury.
Posted by: Editor on Jul 2, 2012 at 03:48 AM
Thanks for your comments. I did proof read KAKE's article for them. They have corrected their error. Don't assume I am an idiot. The original said that no one was in the house and after the fire 2 survivors were found in the house. Of course the writer is not going to apologize for a mistake.
Posted by: Hmmm
Location: Wichita
on Jul 1, 2012 at 08:22 PM
Actually i did read the article and the 3 comments that stated "no1 was inside the home but the 2 victims were located "outside" the home. So i re-read the article The article is plain n clear to me. It states "no one was found inside the home. The victim and her 2yr old son had excaped when she heard popping and crackling (from the fire). The victims were found outside after the fire was contained." so 2me it sounds as if they were inside the home, the mother and her child had left the house when she heard the popping and crackleing and had went outside. They were found outside after the fire was under control. So instead of downing on the reporter of this article, re-read it ourself beforebyou assume u found a mistake in this report. It dont make the reporter look bad, it makes u silly because u did not "proof read" the article.
Posted by: Anne on Jul 1, 2012 at 05:01 PM
Praying for a speedy pain free recovery for mom & her child! Thankful they both got out of the house!
Posted by: Anonymous on Jul 1, 2012 at 03:10 PM
Did you actually read it? "No one was found inside the home, but once the fire was under control, two victims were located outside."
Posted by: slow down on Jul 1, 2012 at 11:26 AM
What it means is that they were not inside the home while the fire department was working the fire. They were not found inside; they were found outside.
Posted by: Robin on Jul 1, 2012 at 11:22 AM
We are doing a "helping Hands" event for this family at Huhot Mungolian Grill...Tuesday July 3rd from 5-8 10% of our sales will go to help this family who lost everything...come and eat dinner with us Tuesday night the family will appreciate it...
Posted by: Editor on Jul 1, 2012 at 11:05 AM
"No one was inside", then 2 people were inside. Seriously, who writes your articles? I hope the mother and child survive their injuries.
People can make assumptions as they wish.
Our thoughts and prayers for mother and child for a complete recovery. Sorry to hear about another firework related injury.
Thanks for your comments. I did proof read KAKE's article for them. They have corrected their error. Don't assume I am an idiot. The original said that no one was in the house and after the fire 2 survivors were found in the house.
Of course the writer is not going to apologize for a mistake.
Actually i did read the article and the 3 comments that stated "no1 was inside the home but the 2 victims were located "outside" the home. So i re-read the article The article is plain n clear to me. It states "no one was found inside the home. The victim and her 2yr old son had excaped when she heard popping and crackling (from the fire). The victims were found outside after the fire was contained." so 2me it sounds as if they were inside the home, the mother and her child had left the house when she heard the popping and crackleing and had went outside. They were found outside after the fire was under control. So instead of downing on the reporter of this article, re-read it ourself beforebyou assume u found a mistake in this report. It dont make the reporter look bad, it makes u silly because u did not "proof read" the article.
Praying for a speedy pain free recovery for mom & her child! Thankful they both got out of the house!
Did you actually read it? "No one was found inside the home, but once the fire was under control, two victims were located outside."
What it means is that they were not inside the home while the fire department was working the fire. They were not found inside; they were found outside.
We are doing a "helping Hands" event for this family at Huhot Mungolian Grill...Tuesday July 3rd from 5-8 10% of our sales will go to help this family who lost everything...come and eat dinner with us Tuesday night the family will appreciate it...
"No one was inside", then 2 people were inside. Seriously, who writes your articles? I hope the mother and child survive their injuries.