If you missed Dave Phillips' final Overtime Live, watch it on the kake.com Sports page.
Current Conditions
News Poll
How will Dave Phillips spend his free time?

Kneeling before his Mark Mangino Shrine
Stalking Mario Chalmers
Taking his Power Towel to the World's Largest Ball of Twine
Going Howard Hughes while he watches old OTL clips


Judge Denies Another Tiller Request Save Email Print
Posted: 8:39 PM Jan 30, 2008
Last Updated: 8:39 PM Jan 30, 2008
Email Address: natasha.trelfa@kake.com

A | A | A

Doctor George Tiller faced another courtroom setback Wednesday when a judge denied his attorney's request to protect his abortion patients privacy from a grand jury.

Attorney's for Tiller and the Center for Reproductive Rights argue that turning over nearly 2,000 patient records would be a serious invasion of privacy. They asked Judge Paul Buchannan to quash the subpoenas.

"We think the constitutional dimensions of this case also compel similar restrictions and safeguards," says Tiller attorney Lee Thompson. "In fact, without those, the subpoena must be quashed."

Tiller's attorney's also argued that the request was too broad, but the DA's office says the requests are more than reasonable.

"The reason the court held back was because the statute allowing a judicially sanctioned inquisition requires a reasonable suspicion to start it," explained Deputy District Attorney Ann Swegle.

In the end, Buchannan ordered the document case numbers be turned over by Thursday, so a random selection process could be started.

Tiller's attorney's and CFRR say they plan to appeal because they are concerned about the privacy of the patients involved.

The grand jury has 90 days to file charges. So far, it has been 22 days. The records must be turned over to the district attorney by noon Thursday.

Email  del.icio.us   Google   Yahoo  digg
More Stories
Stroke Hospitalizes Local Lawmaker

Money Matters

Woman Shot in North Wichita

Family of Amber Goff Speaks Out

Renovation Ripoff

Local Teen Needs Community's Help

Witness Tried to Save Murder Victim

Grease Thieves Target Local Business

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Anonymous Location: Boston, MA on Feb 13, 2008 at 12:55 PM
Medical records are a private matter that most Americans take very seriously. Thus, there are laws to prevent these private matters from becoming public record. Doctor/patient confidence is something we should be proud to uphold. No matter your position on abortion, it is illegal to make these records public. Also, people choose abortion for many reasons, some of them dramatic, such as pregnancy resulting from incest and rape...even more reason to keep these matters private.

Posted by: cliff Location: wichita on Jan 31, 2008 at 12:08 PM
"the statute repuires a reasonable suspicion" to start a grand jury? I thought it only took names on a petition since thats what it took.

Posted by: Tony Location: Wichita on Jan 31, 2008 at 08:17 AM
Paul Buchannan = Pro-Life Kansas Lacky This judge is the farthest from fair judge on the bench.

Posted by: cliff Location: wichita on Jan 31, 2008 at 08:10 AM
Horray, chalk up another win for the taliban and their pet judge.

Posted by: Mom of 4 on Jan 31, 2008 at 06:26 AM
I don't know why the patients would care if people know they had an abortion. It's legal so why should they want to hide unless they know it is wrong to end a pregnancy the way they did.

National AP Video
Call me at (316) 263-0001 or (888)263-0001 Roger Riedmiller.